Hej
Bangkok Pundit tar upp Juntans märkliga syn på vad som är tillåtet respektive förbjudet nu under rådande diktatur http://asiancorrespondent.com/124562/only-some-vitriol-and-hate-speech-is-seemingly-bad/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=only-some-vitriol-and-hate-speech-is-seemingly-bad ,juntan verkar onekligen tillåta i princip vad som helst ifrån det gula lägret medans dom röda t.ex straffas för att läsa 1984 eller hålla upp tre fingrar.
-
Retired Police General Visut Vanichbut* posts on Facebook:
“Translation: For me… I would choose “Mrs. Rose”. After helping her get out from the water, I would bring her to the junta. Once she is in jail, I would whisper to other prisoners that Mrs Rose defamed our father. Let’s get her heavily. Torture her until she is dead. Slowly is better. Guard of the page of Visut Vanichbut”
Translation: Image reads: Hypothetically, if these 5 living things were about to drown to death and if you could save one life who would you choose? Examples are: Somsak J of Thammasat University, Tung Jang Rai, Rose (the Thai girl who lives in Britain who has posted clips about the Thai monarchy and faces a lese majeste charge), Aum Neko (see here), and a dog escaping the heat.
2. Then you have an article from ASTV Manager fantasizing gang rape:
Khao Sod translates:
BP: The junta has warned people over divisive speech although they are largely focusing on reds and those with links to the reds or Puea Thai (like eating a sandwich in public, reading 1984 or holding up signs like “Long Live USA”). Rape and torture fantasies seemingly do not qualify. What is the standard that is being applied?
Mvh isan lover
